Vision

Research vision

Stroke, epilepsy, dementia and small vessel disease are not only diseases of neurons — they are disorders of the wider neurovascular system that sustains brain function.

Basic biological questions, approach and expected impact — Neurovascular Systems Biology Laboratory.
Basic biological questions, approach and expected impact — the programme in one figure. Click to enlarge.

Neurological disorders such as stroke, epilepsy, dementia, and cerebral small vessel disease are not only diseases of neurons. They are disorders of the wider neurovascular system that sustains brain function.

My research vision is to understand how vascular cells, glia, neurons, plasma-derived signals, and extracellular matrix interact to determine whether the brain remains resilient or becomes vulnerable in disease. I aim to build a Neurovascular Systems Biology Laboratory that defines how the blood-brain barrier and the broader neurovascular unit are organized, how they fail under metabolic and inflammatory stress, and how these mechanisms can reveal tractable points for intervention.

By integrating single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, advanced imaging, disease models, histopathology, public dataset reanalysis, and RNA-level molecular analysis, my long-term goal is to move beyond descriptive disease atlases toward mechanistic and targetable principles of neurovascular dysfunction.

Read more Show less

By integrating single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, advanced imaging, disease models, histopathology, public dataset reanalysis, and RNA-level molecular analysis, my long-term goal is to move beyond descriptive disease atlases toward mechanistic and targetable principles of neurovascular dysfunction.

Long-term direction

Together, the three questions below define a research program in neurovascular systems biology. The goal is to generate molecular and spatial maps of vascular specialization, uncover how metabolic and inflammatory signals destabilize the blood-brain barrier, and identify RNA-level mechanisms that can be tested as points of intervention.

For the field, this work will provide a systems-level framework linking vascular biology, extracellular matrix remodeling, metabolism, inflammation, glial communication, and RNA regulation in neurological disease. In doing so, it aims to create a research platform where basic discovery, collaborative capability, and translational logic come together.

Key questions

Three questions, one programme

A

Where along the vascular tree does blood-brain barrier failure begin in stroke and epilepsy?

BBB dysfunction is not a uniform, capillary-only event — it is segment-specific across arterial, capillary and venous endothelial states.

How I will find answers

  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Segment-resolved imaging and histopathology
  • Mouse models of stroke, epilepsy and SVD
  • ECM / laminin perturbation

Expected impact

  • Mechanistic atlas of neurovascular zonation
  • New understanding of segment-specific BBB vulnerability
  • Link between ECM and vascular specialization
The full rationale Show less

I hypothesize that blood-brain barrier dysfunction in stroke and epilepsy is not a uniform capillary-only event, but a segment-specific process involving arterial, capillary, and venous endothelial states. In this model, vulnerable vascular segments shift from a restrictive barrier program marked by junctional and transport regulators such as CLDN5, OCLN and MFSD2A toward a more permissive, transcytosis-associated state involving CAV1, CAVIN1 and related caveolar pathways.

I further propose that extracellular matrix composition, vascular basement membrane signals, mural-cell interactions and inflammatory stress determine where and when this switch occurs along the arteriovenous axis.

A central aim is to define whether arterial and arteriole-associated endothelial programs contribute directly to barrier instability, tissue vulnerability and disease propagation. I am particularly interested in whether disease-associated RNA editing events alter genes involved in endothelial transport, junctional stability, extracellular matrix signaling or mural-endothelial communication.

B

How do diet, metabolism and plasma composition reshape blood-brain barrier plasticity?

The BBB is not a static wall but a dynamic sensing interface that responds to circulating metabolites, lipids, hormones, cytokines and microbiome-derived signals.

How I will find answers

  • Dietary and plasma perturbation paradigms
  • Metabolomic and cytokine profiling
  • BBB permeability assays
  • Integration of vascular and glial cell-state mapping

Expected impact

  • Framework linking metabolism to brain barrier plasticity
  • Identification of modifiable upstream drivers
  • New insight into diet–plasma–brain interactions
The full rationale Show less

I hypothesize that diet influences stroke and epilepsy susceptibility by remodeling plasma composition and thereby reprogramming blood-brain barrier state. Rather than viewing the BBB as a static wall, this framework treats it as a dynamic sensing interface.

Distinct dietary and metabolic states may alter the balance between selective endothelial transport, barrier restriction, inflammatory activation and nonspecific transcytosis. Circulating triglycerides, ketone bodies, insulin, leptin, short-chain fatty acids and inflammatory cytokines are predicted to converge on BBB regulators such as SLC16A1/MCT1, MFSD2A, VCAM1, CLDN5, OCLN and caveolar transport pathways. These changes may influence seizure threshold, stroke vulnerability, vascular repair and long-term neuroinflammatory remodeling.

By integrating plasma profiling, transcriptomics, imaging and disease phenotyping, I aim to understand how diet and circulating factors reshape endothelial and gliovascular states — and whether specific plasma signatures can predict or modify brain vulnerability.

C

Can RNA editing be used to restore gliovascular coupling and blood-brain barrier resilience?

Using ADAR-recruiting oligonucleotides to recode connexin43 phosphorylation sites — testing whether RNA-level intervention can preserve astrocytic gap-junction coupling.

How I will find answers

  • Editing-aware bioinformatics
  • Target prioritization and RNA structure logic
  • ADAR-recruiting oligonucleotide design
  • Functional validation with barrier readouts

Expected impact

  • RNA-based therapeutic entry points
  • Shared transcriptomics and RNA biology capability
  • Bridge from mechanism to intervention
The full rationale Show less

I am interested in whether RNA editing can be used as a mechanistic and therapeutic strategy to modify disease-relevant gliovascular pathways. One long-term concept is to use chemically optimized antisense oligonucleotides to recruit endogenous ADAR enzymes to specific RNA targets involved in astrocyte coupling, endothelial regulation and blood-brain barrier function.

As a proof-of-concept strategy, ADAR-recruiting oligonucleotides could be designed to hybridize to selected regions of connexin43 mRNA, creating a short double-stranded RNA substrate that directs site-specific A-to-I editing. Editing the target adenosine in serine codons such as S255 or S368 could, in principle, recode these sites to glycine-like codons. Because glycine lacks the hydroxyl group required for phosphorylation, this approach could test whether preventing seizure-associated phosphorylation at these connexin43 residues preserves astrocytic gap-junction coupling.

This is biologically important because connexin43 phosphorylation and redistribution are linked to impaired astrocyte network communication, altered channel regulation, disrupted homeostatic buffering and gliovascular dysfunction in epilepsy — a mechanism my own earlier work established.

Overall impact

Move from descriptive transcriptomics to predictive, mechanistic and targetable principles of neurovascular dysfunction.